Skip To Main Content

Search Panel

Schools Menu

School Improvement Plan

What is a School Improvement Plan?

A School Improvement Plan (SIP) is a strategic blueprint that schools use to enhance student learning and improve educational practices. It outlines specific goals for improvement, actions to achieve those goals, and methods for measuring progress.

Key Points of a SIP:

  • Goals: Clear objectives the school aims to achieve to enhance student outcomes.
  • Actions: Steps and strategies the school will implement to reach its goals, based on research and effective practices.
  • Monitoring: Regular review of progress with adjustments made to ensure the school stays on track toward its improvement objectives.
     

The purpose of a SIP is to provide a clear roadmap for schools to improve educational outcomes for all students, particularly focusing on eliminating disparities and ensuring equitable opportunities for every student.

Every school in Washington State is required to have a School Improvement Plan.

Visit the Issaquah School District SIP website to learn more about SIPs.

District - School Improvement Plans

 

BLMS Track

Beaver Lake Middle School

School Improvement Plan

2024-2026

Strengths, Challenges, & Opportunities

Root Cause and Contributing Factors of Disproportionality

ISD recognizes that not all students benefit equally or achieve equitably within our district. Our outcome measures such as graduation rate, proficiency on assessments, and grades indicate that we are not achieving equitable results for students in identified ethnic and racial groups, students who are experiencing economic hardships, and students with disabilities. 

ISD is committed to disrupting patterns that result in inequitable outcomes. Global (across time and place) and local factors contribute to inequitable outcomes in our District, including the following: 

  • Institutional racism and ableism 
  • Impacts of economic hardship, including mobility or discontinuity of education 
  • Impacts of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs)  
  • Lack of consistent access to preventative and responsive services when experiencing ACEs 
  • Lack of consistent access to adequate supports designed to address basic and individual educational needs 
  • Lack of consistent access to high quality, inclusive, universally designed, and culturally responsive education 

Reflection & Theory of Action

Backed by Data

Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timebound, Inclusive, Equity-focused goals aligned to the Academic Opportunities priority area of the ISD 3-year strategic plan, referencing data from the School Improvement Data Dashboard.

Data Workbook for Middle School

Note:

  • The BIPOC Focus group includes students in the 4 federal race groups with ongoing disproportionate outcomes: Native American, African American, Hispanic, and Pacific Islander.
  • Students with Disabilities includes students with an Individual Education Plan, served in Special Services programs.
  • *OSPI has not released official attendance data as of the date of completion of this form, December 2024.

School-Based Action Plan

Programs and priorities listed below are being implemented, expanded or sustained during this 2-year SIP cycle at each of our middle schools as part of the ISD Strategic Plan priorities and the establishment of Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS). For this SIP cycle, schools will select 3 strategies with at least two from district-wide programs or systems listed, and describe their school’s implementation plan and strategies for monitoring impact. Be sure to relate actions plans to the 3 SIP goal areas.

Select 1-2 of the following to describe in further detail:

  • Implementation of New Curriculum or Courses. New curriculum is adopted annually. Full implementation requires 2- 4 years of support to establish calibrated learning outcomes, common learning experiences, integrated tiered supports and instruction, and delivery that is universally designed and culturally responsive. ISD Priority 2a,c
  • Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Implementation of UDL as a framework of evidence-based, inclusive, and culturally responsive instructional practices for Tier 1. ISD Priority 2a
  • Grading for Equity. Implementation of grading practices so that [1] grades reflect mastery of key learning goals, [2] students receive feedback, reflect on their understanding, and are given an additional opportunity to demonstrate their learning; and [3] there is consistency and calibration of the measure of student learning. ISD Priority 2
  • Tiered Teams. Implementation of a Tiered Team structure to examine integrated social-emotional and academic achievement data to adjust core instruction and/or intervention planning. ISD Priority 2b
  • Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) / Social-Emotional Learning (SEL). Maintaining or enhancing school-wide systems of support and social emotional learning to increase belonging, well-being, and create the conditions for learning. ISD Priority 1
  • Classroom-Based Intervention. Implementation of targeted supports, accommodations, and interventions (Tier 2) in the classroom setting. ISD Priority 2b
  • Inclusionary Practices. Collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and special education staff to provide a comprehensive continuum of inclusive services within the least restrictive educational environment to ensure that all students reach their full potential. ISD Priority 2b
  • Multilingual Learners support. With the understanding that the whole day is an inclusive language learning experience for all students, collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and multilingual learner specialists to deliver language acquisition strategies, ensure multilingual students have access to all instruction and learning, in a language intensive learning environment so that they achieve their full potential. ISD Priority 2b
Action Implementation Impact: Evidence/Monitoring

Implementation of New Curriculum or CoursesISD Priority 2a,c

Implementing Envision Math with Fidelity

  • District PD and Building led PD: Regular professional development sessions throughout the school year will be allocated for teachers to build a strong understanding of the Envision Math curriculum and its instructional approaches. These sessions will include collaborative planning time to align lessons, share strategies, and address challenges in real time.
  • Utilizing the Math Curriculum Support Person
  • Using building resources to provide time for teachers to collaborate and plan

6th Grade Study Skills Success Class

  • The elective rotation schedule has been adjusted to include the Executive Functioning class for all 6th graders. Dedicated curriculum planning time will allow the lead teacher to tailor the program specifically for 6th-grade needs, incorporating time management, study skills, and organizational strategies.

6th-8th Post-High School Goals and Career Planning

  • Grade specific curriculum delivered in Homeroom (Created by Lisa Neighbors)
  • Additional High School and Beyond curriculum from our BLMS counselors
  • Implementation of a spring career fair
  • Leverage the VOICE Mentor program and connect marginalized students with adult mentors from our community who have achieved professional success and share similar backgrounds or identities. By providing students with role models who can relate to their experiences, we hope to foster a sense of belonging, encourage positive self- identity, and inspire students to see a range of possibilities for their own futures.

Intended Impacts

  • Increased Math Proficiency: By using a coherent, standards-based curriculum, students will develop stronger foundational math skills, leading to improved overall performance across all demographics.
  • Equitable Access to Resources: Access to diverse materials, manipulatives, and differentiated instructional supports will help reach students with varied learning needs, supporting equity in math achievement.
  • Long-term Academic Success: Early intervention at the 6th-grade level will support sustained academic performance, helping close gaps in achievement as students progress through middle school.

Key Data

  • Classroom Assessments
  • Common Assessments (SBA, i-Ready, Envision Success-Maker)
  • Student feedback
  • Teacher feedback
  • Parent feedback

Universal Design for Learning ISD Priority 2a

Danielson Rubric and UDL Crosswalk with

Teacher PD

  • Created a Danielson Rubric and UDL Crosswalk
  • Dedicated time during in-service days and scheduled PD sessions for introducing the UDL-Danielson Rubric crosswalk.
  • Additional time will be allotted for small group discussions to reinforce understanding and application.

UDL in Action Team (Ignite)

  • Scheduled time during faculty meetings for the UDL Ignite Team to lead mini-PD sessions, discuss best practices, and address teacher questions.
  • Planning time for the Ignite Team to coordinate classroom visits and peer observations (starting in January.)
  • Substitute teachers will be arranged as needed to cover classes while Ignite Team members host colleagues.

Professional Development and Goal Setting

  • Monthly dedicated time for UDL goal-setting workshops and individual reflection sessions, allowing teachers to set, review, and adjust their UDL goals throughout the school year
  • Admin modeled UDL throughout August PD, and continues to do so in every faculty meeting

Intended Impacts

  • Enhanced Accessibility for All Learners: By adopting UDL principles, teachers will design lessons that accommodate a wider range of learning styles, abilities, and backgrounds, helping ensure equitable access to content for all students.
  • Increased Student Engagement and Ownership: UDL encourages students to engage with content in ways that are meaningful to them. This flexibility empowers all students, especially those who may feel marginalized by traditional instructional approaches, to take more ownership of their learning.
  • Reduction in Achievement Gaps: With UDL's emphasis on multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement, students who typically face barriers to success (e.g., students with disabilities, English language learners, or students from underrepresented backgrounds) will have more pathways to demonstrate mastery.

Key Data

  • Classroom Assessments
  • Common Assessments (SBA, i-Ready, Envision Success-Maker)
  • Student feedback
  • Teacher feedback

Inclusionary Practices

ISD Priority 2b

Collaboration on Comprehensive Course

Scheduling for Flexible Interventions

  • Specific, individual student data was collected and analyzed to ensure an adequate number of seats were available for the classes needed for each student’s learning level
  • Admin and the special education team worked together to create a Comprehensive Course Schedule (formerly known as Master Schedule) to ensure individual student needs were met
  • The creation of the schedule is transparent, and Admin welcomes regular feedback from teachers before it is minted.

Creative Deployment of Special Education Push-in Minutes Based on Teacher Strengths

  • Increased collaboration between special education teachers and general education teachers
  • Admin support to align service delivery with instructional goals across content areas (e.g., embedding social-emotional skills in PE and literacy in science)

Expansion of Tier 3 Interventions Beyond Special Education

  • Designated homeroom periods will be structured for targeted interventions, with flexibility for students to move in and out based on progress.

Intended Impacts

  • Increased Access to Grade-Level Curriculum: By integrating special education services directly into general education settings, more students with disabilities will have access to grade-level content, reducing disparities in academic achievement and supporting equitable learning experiences.
  • Reduction in Over-Identification for Special Education: By expanding Tier 3 interventions beyond special education, general education students who may otherwise be screened for special education placement will receive the support they need, helping to address disproportionality in special education referrals.

Key Data

  • IEP Goal progress
  • Grades
  • Standardized test
  • Tier 2 Team data collection
  • Teacher notes
  • Student feedback

Additional School Improvement Plan Components

Family engagement

ISD Priority 4

Enhanced Communication through Language Training and Tools

  • Recognizing language as a critical factor in family engagement, we’ve provided training for staff on using language tools that improve communication with families.

Dedicated MLL and Special Education Support

  • Our distinguished Multilingual Learners (MLL) and Special Education (SPED) teams are highly engaged in supporting students and collaborating with families. Through regular check-ins and communication, these teams provide personalized support and guidance, helping families navigate resources and fully engage in their child’s learning experience.

Community-Building Events

  • With the support of our PTSA, we host community events like Fall Bingo and Heritage Night, which bring together families from diverse backgrounds to celebrate and connect.

Health and Wellness Support

  • We aim to meet students’ medical and wellness needs directly by offering immunization clinics, flu/COVID clinics, and sports physicals onsite, particularly supporting families in our boundary’s affordable housing areas.

Intended Impacts

  • Close attendance and engagement gaps often correlated with health disparities.
  • Foster an inclusive environment where families from all backgrounds feel welcomed and involved in school life.
  • Build trust between the school and linguistically diverse families.

Key Data

  • Attendance
  • Regular review meetings with attendance team (counselors, admin, attendance secretary)
  • SAEBRS Data
  • Counselor’s 5 minute Wellness Meetings notes
  • Student and Family feedback

 

Technology Integration

Engagement Through Interactive Learning Tools

Digital tools like Gizmos, Kahoot!, NotebookLM, and Canvas enable students to engage interactively with content and each other, making learning more dynamic and student-centered. These tools allow students to demonstrate understanding in multiple ways, from video responses to interactive polls, catering to different learning styles and preferences.

Accessible Learning Through Digital Platforms

Our school leverages platforms like Canvas and Securely to provide students with access to instructional materials, assignments, and resources at any time, inside or outside of school, in a safe and intentional manner. These platforms support differentiated learning and provide tools like text-to- speech, translation, and other accessibility features.

Targeted Support and Data-Driven Intervention

Our teachers use technology tools that analyze student data to offer targeted, personalized instruction. Platforms like i- Ready allow teachers to monitor progress and provide differentiated support based on each student’s unique learning needs.

ê Data-driven technology enables us to identify and address gaps in learning quickly, especially for students who may be struggling academically or have limited foundational skills. By providing timely, tailored intervention, we help mitigate disproportionality in academic achievement among different student groups.

Intended Impacts

  • Students who face challenges due to language barriers, disabilities, or lack of resources at home can engage with learning in a way that meets their individual needs, reducing barriers and addressing inequities in educational access.
  • Offering alternative assessment and expression methods levels the playing field for students who may struggle with traditional assessments, particularly benefiting multilingual learners and students with diverse learning styles.
  • Early intervention through technology helps address academic gaps for students from historically underrepresented groups, mitigating disparities in achievement and ensuring more equitable support.

Key Data

  • Student work completion rates
  • Assessment Scores
  • i-Ready Assessment progress
  • Student feedback through surveys and reflections
  • Teacher feedback

School Improvement Team & Procedure Information

Principal

Kathryn Coffin

SIP Team Members

Rashmika Abajian, Counselor Lead

Tiffany Bahall, Math Teacher and Equity Lead Lisa Chamberlain, Special Education Lead

Micki Dang, ASB and Student Leadership Advisor Karen Harmon, 7th Grade Team Leader

Kara Heaphy, PE Lead Tim Ireland, Health Lead Denise Luci, Science Lead Alex Norton, MTSS Lead

Belinda Rendon, Math Lead

Carolyn Santos, Social Studies Lead and IEA Rep

Andrew Stephenson, Assistant Principal and Athletic Director and Building Safety Lead Sarah Sundt, Language Arts and New Teacher Mentor Lead

Ken Sylvester, 6th Grade Team Lead

Marianna Vail, Music, Fine Arts and Electives Lead

Steven Walsh, Ed Tech Lead and 8th Grade Team Lead ASB Student Leaders

Supervisor Review

Sherri Kokx, Nov. 7, 2024

Site Council or PTSA Review

September 11, 2024

School Board Review

November 19, 2024